But first, I feel it is important to go over what children's toys represent symbolically and what role they play in our world and in human development. When discussing the difference between technological and traditional toys and how they affect childhood development, Brenna Hassinger- Das in the PsychINFO article she has co-written
"The Transforming Toybox Examining the U.S. Infant Toy Market," states that "Primarily, Traditional, non-electronic toys foster three types of play: pretend play, object play, and physical play (Hassinger-Das 15). According to Hassinger, pretend play is the form where action figures, figurines, plush toys, and dolls are tools children use to play in a part be it an army soldier or a princess, and as a means to grow a deeper understanding of human behavior (Hassinger-Das 15). Object play involves toys like building blocks are tools for children to learn spatial skills as well as to express themselves in a way that is unique to them (Hassinger-Das 15). Finally, we have physical play which involves any sports equipment all in aid of children's physical health development (Hassinger-Das 15). Given all that, it's safe to come to the conclusion that toys act as a universal symbol of childhood as well as innocence and development, as they are tools used for human development be it physical or psychological.
So this is how all of this ties into how the toys symbolize and foreshadow both the parallels between John and Jeff and both characters' downfall. In the first flashback scene from Jeff's side of the story, we are greeted with a back-lit eye-level shot of the character acting out his revenge fantasy on his son's killer that he plans on acting out once meeting him. Though not a toy itself, we see Jeff use the pistol in what Hassinger regards as object play as he uses it to express his anger and sorrow for his lost son, and practice his position when he meets his killer. During this scene, the toys in the background (the possessions of his lost son) are less focused than in the foreground object which is focused in. That and the use of backlighting and low-key lighting hints at what Jeff will lose in the process of his self-destruction due to vengeance consuming him.
The background objects being out of focus suggests that Jeff is so consumed with rage and vengeance, that he forgets what is important in his life, what he can control, and what he has now. Thus, it foreshadows his daughter eventually being lost due to this. Low-key lights are staples in the horror genre and are famously known for being used for moody or atmospheric scenes (Mamer 294). This is important to bring up as the harsh shadows in this scene you see in old noir and German expressionist films unconventionally used to show anger and desperation then a sense of fear or imposing doom as you see Jeff act out his revenge fantasy. But it's used effectively because the shadows are symbolic of the parallels between John and Jeff's morality. Two sides of the same coin use the will of people to compensate for their shared misfortunes. Those shared misfortunes are the loss of both John and Jeff's son. So the toys in the background being cast into the shadows and are in less focus both symbolize what they lost, as toys can act as a symbol of childhood and human development.
Now let's discuss the scenes where the toys are in focus, as well as the stuffed animals themselves. But first, let's briefly go over the psychological significance of stuffed animals and what they're placed in human culture. Though this was stated in regards to neglection in childhood, in terms of discussing attachment towards companions of animals or stuffed animals, M. Rose Barlow argues in her 2012 Anthrozoös article "Childhood Neglect, Attachment to Companion Animals, and Stuffed Animals as Attachment Objects in Women and Men" that "While attachment to companion animals has been found to be in many ways similar to attachment to humans, toy stuffed animals have been conceptualized to serve more as comfort object than as a replacement for human attachment" (Barlow 113). This is relevant to the scene when we meet Corbett Denlen (Jeff's Daughter) as she uses her brother Dylan's (Jeff's dead son) doll to sleep with.
Symbolically, the stuffed pig doll represents the companion role for children to get attached to in stuffed animals, but as a coping mechanism for her broken family. Saw III as well as its sequel are about broken familial ties more than anything. Corbett has lost her brother due to an accident, her mother whom she lost due to cheating on her husband, and her father who we see is mostly absent in her life due to acting out revenge fantasies. The pig she sleeps with represents an individual she can rely on and feel a sense of comfort and familiarity as it belongs to her brother so in her mind, the pig is her brother.
You can see a slight parallel with Billy the Puppet. Not only Billy the Puppet serve as an alter ego of John, but an object to get attached to cope with the shortcomings in his personal life like cancer and losing his son. I think this aspect of John is highlighted in the angel trap scene when he states to Kerry "You identify with a cold corpse then you do with a living human" (Bousman 14:30). Perhaps John picked Kerry as he related to the thoughts of relating and projecting your thoughts and fears into a nonliving thing. This sorta relates to Carl Jung's idea of the painting of animals in caves during pre-historic times, when he states that they have "function of a "double" by its symbolic slaughter, the hunters attempt to anticipate and ensure the death of the real animal" (Jung 235). This time in Jeff's flashbacks and the angel trap, the toys are the character's double. In the opening shot of Jeff's flashback, the toys out of focus are the double of his family and are figures that would soon be lost.
Now, we enter the scene where the toys were burned and that is the pig vat trap. But, it is important to discuss what the sequence represents on three different levels. First, the toys burning represent the sacrifices we must make on a moral level. Saw III challenges viewers on an emotional level while the first one challenges the viewers on an intellectual level and the second one an emotional level. What I mean by that is that Saw III shows us the horrible acts of people that stem from personal vendettas and how they affects those around us so we can overcome them to benefit the lives of ourselves and those around us.
Barlow, M. Rose, et al. “Childhood Neglect, Attachment to Companion Animals, and Stuffed Animals as Attachment Objects in Women and Men.” Anthrozoös, vol. 25, no. 1, Mar. 2012, pp. 111–119, https://doi.org/10.2752/175303712x13240472427159.
Bousman, Lynn, Darren. Saw III. Lionsgate.
Bousman, Lynn, Darren. Saw IV. Lionsgate.
Hassinger-Das, Brenna, et al. “The Transforming Toybox: Examining the U.S. Infant Toy Market.” American Journal of Play, vol. 15, no. 1, Jan. 2023, pp. 14–34. EBSCOhost, research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=f97e4e48-f6ba-3311-9cc2-06935168a5ba.
“Man And His Symbols : Carl Gustav Jung : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive.” Internet Archive, 1964, archive.org/details/B-001-004-443-ALL/page/n231/mode/2up.
.jpeg)





.jpeg)








No comments:
Post a Comment